Mathematics Education Trends and Research

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID metr-00008, 7 Pages

doi: 10.5899/2013/metr-00008

Research Article

Examining Creativity of Students through Smart Board in Learning Mathematics

Mohammad-Hassan Behzadi1, Maryam Manuchehri1 *

1Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

* Corresponding author. Email address:

Received: 09 February 2013; Accepted: 20 February 2013

Copyright © 2013 Mohammad-Hassan Behzadi and Maryam Manuchehri. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


In present era, students and teachers need possibilities that ease teaching and learning process. Electronic instruments such as computer, software, and smart instruments will increase abilities for students. The purpose of this study is to examine the creativity level of high school students in the learning environment using smart board and compare it to traditional environment. Participants of this study were consisted of girl students at second grade. One girly high school is selected by semi-cluster sampling method. Research method is implemented via quasi-experimental method using pretest and posttest for control and experiment groups which are same at scientific level. Based on the result of this research via Leven and T-tests, it is indicated that there is significant difference between creativity level of the students who learn mathematics using smart board and the students who learn mathematics via traditional method. Therefore it seems that using smart board will ease mathematical learning process.

Keywords: Mathematics; smart board; creativity; education; learning.


  1. M. Akhavan, Status of ICT in the field of education and electronic publication in high schools of Tehran, Science and Technology journals, 2 (2008).

  2. A. Atkhison, Comparison of pupil learning and achievement in computer aided learning and traditionally taught Situations with special, reference to cognitive style and gender issue educational Psychology, 24 (5) (2004).

  3. M. Attaran, Information technology; a ground for reform in education system, Tehran: education technology development agency for smart schools, 20 (5) (2004) 393-401.

  4. M. Attaran, I. Van Lar, Managing the use of technology: an eight step guild for administrators, Journal of management development, 20 (5) (2001) 393-401.

  5. M. Azizi, Study motivation of progress, mathematical anxiety and performance among students of 1st grade in high school studies in Tehran, (2003).

  6. A. Charpani, The effects of ICT on curriculum, Curriculum and publication of textbooks office of skills, (2001).

  7. D. Ferguseon, Technology in a constructivism Classroom, Information Technology in childhood Education Annual, (2001) 45.

  8. W. Haddad, S. Jurich, ICT for Education, Potential and Potency, (2000) 30-35.

  9. Zahra kalantarnia, Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, Ahmad Shahvarani, Mohammad-Hassan Behzadi, The study of application of algebrator software for mathematical problems solving, Mathematics Education Trends and Research, 2012 (2012) , 1-7.

  10. K. Karimi, M. Manuchehri, A. Shahvarani, Examining performance of students in learning mathematics using smart board, International journal of Emerging trends in Engineering and development, 4 (2) (2012) 911-918.

  11. M. Saatchi, K. Kamkari, m. Asghrean, Psychological tests, Tehran:virayesh, (2010) 21-23.